According to the research, the statement "Linear molecules must be nonpolar, thus linear molecules cannot participate in dipole-dipole attraction" is true.
<h3>What are dipole-dipole attractions?</h3>
It is observed between a positive dipole of a polar molecule with the negative dipole of another, the atom with the highest electronegativity attracts electrons towards itself, forming a negative dipole around it.
In polar covalent bonds, the atom with the least electronegativity, the dipole formed has a positive charge, since it partially gives up its electrons.
Therefore, we can conclude that according to the research, the statement "Linear molecules must be nonpolar, thus linear molecules cannot participate in dipole-dipole attraction" is true.
Learn more about dipole-dipole attraction here: brainly.com/question/14361169
#SPJ1
The oxidation state of Lithium changed from 0 to +1
The oxidation state of hydrogen changed from +1 to 0.
<h3>What is the oxidation state of the elements in the reaction?</h3>
The equation of the redox reaction is given as follows:
2 Li + 2 H₂O → 2 LiOH + H₂
The oxidation states of the elements changed as follows:
The oxidation state of Lithium changed from 0 to +1
The oxidation state of hydrogen changed from +1 to 0.
In conclusion, the reaction is a redox reaction.
Learn more about oxidation state at: brainly.com/question/27239694
#SPJ1
Scientific misconducts are an infringement of the ethical codes. In the given scenario the negligence of the cited source in the data is misconduct.
<h3>What is cited source?</h3>
Cited sources are the references of the data taken from the other places and websites that are included in your content as an image, text, figures, statements, etc.
The text or the data used from other sources must be cited by including the name of the authors from the authentic source followed by the author from the secondary reference.
Therefore, the negligence of the cited source is a type of scientific misconduct.
Learn more about scientific misconduct here:
brainly.com/question/21502129
#SPJ1
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
