Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
C because it is a test you take for receiving college credit without taking college courses
Answer:
<em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>helpful</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>to</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em>
Yes, this is true!
You should genereally use sources for anything you say if it's not your original idea - this way you can avoid being accused of plagiarism.
One exception is common knowledge - so you don't have to provide sources for example for what a capital of a certain country is.
