First off, there are a few requirments for voting eligibility, and they differ by state. The most common answer is citizens under the age of 18. They don't really want kids who aren't in tune to what's going on in the country who will vote for someone who will potentially make a BIG impact in the nation. They also don't want convicted felons/criminals voting.
The specified requirements are as follows:
<em>Voting eligibility:</em>
- A legal U.S. citizen
- A resident of the state you're voting in
- Are 18 years or older by the time of the specific election
- Live for 30 days prior to the elction in the area of the precinct (voting station) you vote in
<em>You're NOT eligible to vote if:</em>
- Legally declared "mentally incompetent" by a court
- Registered to vote in a different state than the one you are voting in
- In prison, incarcerated, jail, etc.
- Convcited of a felony or on parole
Hope ths helps!
Answer:
A logging company promises to plant five trees for every one it cuts down. You may have seen a forest affected by acid rain. The trees are stripped of leaves and branches and the whole forest appears to be dying. Acid rain is caused by air pollution and has a harmful effect on plant life.
Explanation:
Can I have brainliest
<span>A monopoly must consider customer demand, and then set prices at the most profitable level.</span>
Answer:
The School Board says Libby and her friends released an unauthorized publication on school grounds. Their defense should be "the whole program (including content, publication, and location) was discussed with and approved by her teacher (her primary interface with the school hierarchy)" If there is any fault to be found, it falls on a) the Teacher's head since she didn't advise Libby to seek permission from any other members in the hierarchy, and/or b) the hierarchy itself for not conveying the need to seek permission for thios type of program. I'm sure other "publications" (artwork, themes, book reports, biographies, and so on) can be shown to set precedent for publications on school grounds without formal permissions.
Re First Ammendment Rights: The description of documents in the ammendment clearly parallels the content of the newspaper. Per referenced source": Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.
Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
Explanation:
Answer:
Downward mobility
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
- Social stratification
- Social inconsistency
- Horizontal mobility
- Downward mobility
Social mobility refers to the movement of people, families or groups in the social hierarchy in which they live. A type of social mobility is vertical mobility. This occurs when a person changes its social class. When a person moves to a higher social class (through more wealth or a more prestigious occupation) this is known as "upward mobility." When a person moves to a lower social class, this is known as "downward mobility."
