15) 1,054,850
16)5,226
(Sorry for my sloppy work but I used these steps to solve it)
Answer:
<h2>D</h2>
The cube of twice a number decreased by 11
The new parking lot must hold twice as many cars as the previous parking lot. The previous parking lot could hold 56 cars. So this means the new parking lot must hold 2 x 56 = 112 cars
Let y represent the number of cars in each row, and x be the number of total rows in the parking lot. Since the number of cars in each row must be 6 less than the number of rows, we can write the equation as:
y = x - 6 (1)
The product of cars in each row and the number of rows will give the total number of cars. So we can write the equation as:
xy = 112 (2)
Using the above two equations, the civil engineer can find the number of rows he should include in the new parking lot.
Using the value of y from equation 1 to 2, we get:
x(x - 6) = 112 (3)
This equation is only in terms of x, i.e. the number of rows and can be directly solved to find the number of rows that must in new parking lot.
Dimension of one of the floors of one room that David wants to install tiles is 18feet long by 12 feet wide
Then
Area of the above room = 18 * 12 square feet
= 216 square feet
Dimension of the floor of the other room that David wants to install tiles is 24 feet long and 16 feet wide
Then
Area of the other room = 24 * 16 square feet
= 384 square feet
Then
The total square feet of the
rooms that David wants to install tiles = 216 + 384
= 600 square feet
Cost of the tile that covers 1 square feet = $5
Cost of the 4 tiles that cover 4 square feet = $17
Then
Area that can be covered with 4 square feet of tiles = 600/4 square feet
= 150 square feet
Minimum cost of covering
the two rooms that David wants to install tiles = 150 * 17 dollars
= 2550 dollars
So the minimum cost of installing the tiles on the two floors of David's two rooms is $2550. I hope the procedure is simple enough for you to understand.
Answer:
None of these.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's assume we are trying to figure out if (x-6) is a factor. We got the quotient (x^2+6) and the remainder 13 according to the problem. So we know (x-6) is not a factor because the remainder wasn't zero.
Let's assume we are trying to figure out if (x^2+6) is a factor. The quotient is (x-6) and the remainder is 13 according to the problem. So we know (x^2+6) is not a factor because the remainder wasn't zero.
In order for 13 to be a factor of P, all the terms of P must be divisible by 13. That just means you can reduce it to a form that is not a fraction.
If we look at the first term x^3 and we divide it by 13 we get 
we cannot reduce it so it is not a fraction so 13 is not a factor of P
None of these is the right option.
