Company A has a sales position with a yearly salary of $42,000. Company B has a similar sales position with a slary of $39,000 plus 1% conmission on yearly sales.
Let x be the amount of yearly sales
Company A has a sales position with a yearly salary of $42,000.
yearly salary = 42,000
Company B has a similar sales position with a salary of $39,000 plus 1% commission on yearly sales.
1% is 0.01
yearly salary = 39,000+ 0.01x
yearly sales is the salary at company A greater than the salary and conmission at company B
A > B
42000 > 39000+ 0.01x
We solve the inequality
39000+ 0.01x < 42000
Subtract 39000 on both sides
0.01x < 3000
divide by 0.01
x> 300,000
For yearly sales > $300,000, the salary at company A greater than the salary and commission at company B
= 9n + 63
generate the first few terms using the recursive equation
f(1) = 72
f(2) = 72 + 9 = 81
f(3) = 81 + 9 = 90
f(4) = 90 + 9 = 99
the sequence is 72, 81, 90, 99, .....
This is an arithmetic sequence whose n th term formula is
= 
+ (n - 1 )d
where is the first term and d the common difference
d = 99 - 90 = 90 - 81 = 81 - 72 = 9 and = 72
= 72 + 9(n - 1) = 72 + 9n - 9 = 9n + 63 ← explicit formula
Answer:
domain - (-infinity,infinity)
range - (-infinity, 2]
axis of sym - x=-1
y int - (0,-1)
at what value (row 1) - (-1,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
domain is side to side, it never ends bc of the arrows
range is top to bottom, there is no bottom bc of the arrow, but it has a top at 2 (the value on the y axis)
the axis of sym is basically the line that runs through the vertex, it's where you could fold it in half and it would still match up
Answer:
Not justified
Step-by-step explanation:
ADA requirements are for a slope of 1 in 12 or less, an 8.3% grade, or an angle of 4.8° (actually, 4.764° when rounded to 3 decimal places). The ramp angle found by the assessor is compliant.
The tenant complaint does not seem justified.
