Answer:
Jade's work makes sense, Peter's does not.
Step-by-step explanation:
What's wrong with Peter's work:
Peter did not apply associative property correctly. You cannot change what is inside the parenthesis. He also shouldn't be using associative property to solve this equation because it just doesn't make sense!
Jade's work:
She applied distributive property correctly and multiplied each term in the parenthesis by 2. All of her processes are logical and make sense! I could go on, but everything is correct lol
Best of wishes mate!
We have the equation for company 1: y = 3x + 5. That means it costs $3 to rent a movie with a $5 fee no matter how many movies you rent. It would benefit us to have the equation for company 2, so we need to find it using 2 points on the line. I picked the points (2,14) and (0,12). Find the slope of this by using the slope formula:

which gives us a slope of 1. Now we can use that slope and the slope-intercept form of a line to find the y-intercept, which serves as the fee for renting from company 2. 14=1(2)+b and 14 = 2 + b and b = 12. The equation then for company 2 is y=1x+12. This means it costs $1 to rent movies, but your fee to rent, no matter how many movies you pick, is $12. The "rate of change" in the choices refers to the slope. The slope in company 1's equation is 3 and the slope in company 2's equation is 1. The best description is the first choice that says "There is a higher rate of change at Company 1".
Answer:
7 + 11
Explanation:
<u>sum of 7 and 11 means addition of both the integers</u>
**Answer**
The true statement is: The probability that a randomly selected player on Team C is 10 years old is 5/16
please mark me brainliest, happy holidays :)
Answer:
why is the paper wet….
Step-by-step explanation:
c