<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
Severe Inflation
Above $2.34
Explanation:
If this economy has encountered a Recovery from Point "R" to Point "X" (as viewed by the Keynesian Model), then one Risk is a movement toward Point "P" with severe inflation. The corresponding AS/AD Model would move from a Price Level of $2.00 to above $2.34.
The audit expectation gap is caused by unrealistic user expectations. The auditors provides reasonable gap examples that would not be included in unrealistic user expectations.
NASBA believes the expectancy gap relating to fraud and going problems in a financial statement audit may be caused by a few factors: lack of knowledge by way of the general public as to what an audit is and what auditors do; inconsistent audit execution in these regions by some auditors due to lack of expertise.
The expectation hole exists while auditors and the public keep distinct beliefs about the auditors' obligations and obligations and the messages conveyed by way of audit reports. apparently, there's an opening between what the public expects and what it virtually receives.
Learn more about auditors here: brainly.com/question/26048609
#SPJ4
Answer:
$31000 will be allowed as expenditure
Explanation:
given data
Wheelchair = $10,000
Whirlpool bath = $10,000
Maintenance = $1,000
Increased utility bills = $1,000
various home modifications = $10,000
solution
as here value of the home increased = $1000
and that is increaed utility bill of the whirlpool
so that expenditure will be added to value of asset
so
total expenditure is = $10000 + $10000 + $10000 + $1000 = $31000
so $31000 will be allowed as expenditure
