Answer:
The answer can be defined as follows:
Explanation:
Foreign countries would have no right to threaten a weakened China's freedom by growing its control. China is dominated by large political, economic, and influence a company in international relations. It's indeed unfair to China to threaten independence from Britain for its benefit and the creation of power.
The British claimed it was intended for combat leaders and troops in government who abused the people and to not compete with China. Its point is, nevertheless, that China's rise has a major impact on some other foreign countries.
It would be the major cause of the military catastrophe that threatened China's freedom. Increasing nation fights for power and control. For just this purpose, China can not rise peacefully. By making it very clear to its neighbors as well as the USA that China has peacenik motives and that it would not use force to shift the balance of power, China will alleviate all fears of its rise. Sadly, each other's intentions can never be certain of States.
Today, by slowly building defensive, not aggressive armed units, China can avoid confrontation. Although they did, the foundation would have not collapsed and could continue to rise comfortably without any of the danger of foreign countries interfering. Perhaps surprisingly, Chinese leaders also claim how the military has been primarily designed for defense.
d.) The language arouses readers' emotions against the king.
The correct answer is
<span>A. to protect the interests of people working in an industry and maintain standards within the industry
They were made to protect people from artisans that would trick them as well as to protect artisans from other artisans. It prevented unfair competition or fraud among themselves, and then protected consumers form bad merchants or fraudulent behavior.</span>
Answer:
Lets us strive for friendship as a nation both internally and with other nations.
Rather than fighting ourselves, let us make peace that will last and work together to help the helpless others who are wounded and are in need; the orphans and the widowed.
Cheers!
<span>There is evidence that the monumental decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 had a direct impact on crime years later. If more poor and unwed women were able to end their pregnancies, fewer poor children were being born into lives of neglect and poverty. Since crime is a natural outgrowth of being poor and disadvantaged, and unwanted, there would be less crime because those people never existed.</span>
