1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seropon [69]
2 years ago
13

What was the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Marbury vs. Madison case?

History
2 answers:
kifflom [539]2 years ago
6 0
The Marbury v<span>. </span>Madison<span> of 1803 was </span>important<span> because it was the first </span>Supreme Court case<span> to apply the principle of judicial review, the power of federal </span>courts<span> to void acts of Congress that were in conflict with the Constitution.</span>
algol132 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

What was the significance of the supreme Court's ruling in the "Marbury Vs. Madison Case?

A.)The ruling determined that congress could act against the president if it wished

B.)The ruling determined that the supreme court was more powerful than the president

C.)The Ruling determined that laws that violated the U.S constitution could be thrown out.

D.)The ruling determined that presidents could not remove judges appointed by their predecessor

You might be interested in
Two reasons why cites grow on rivers
WITCHER [35]

1. They can be formed bcause of events

2.  Cities can also grow on rivers to help grow the poupulation

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Battle of Gettysburg a turning point in the Civil War?
nikklg [1K]
The answer is C. Hope that helped!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZZZ HELP MEEE LOLOLOL
yawa3891 [41]

<span><span>IT IS an awful lot of rubbish. Since 1960 the amount of municipal waste being collected in America has nearly tripled, reaching 245m tonnes in 2005. According to European Union statistics, the amount of municipal waste produced in western Europe increased by 23% between 1995 and 2003, to reach 577kg per person. (So much for the plan to reduce waste per person to 300kg by 2000.) As the volume of waste has increased, so have recycling efforts. In 1980 America recycled only 9.6% of its municipal rubbish; today the rate stands at 32%. A similar trend can be seen in Europe, where some countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, now recycle 60% or more of their municipal waste. Britain's recycling rate, at 27%, is low, but it is improving fast, having nearly doubled in the past three years.Even so, when a city introduces a kerbside recycling programme, the sight of all those recycling lorries trundling around can raise doubts about whether the collection and transportation of waste materials requires more energy than it saves. We are constantly being asked: Is recycling worth doing on environmental grounds? says Julian Parfitt, principal analyst at Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a non-profit British company that encourages recycling and develops markets for recycled materials.Studies that look at the entire life cycle of a particular material can shed light on this question in a particular case, but WRAP decided to take a broader look. It asked the Technical University of Denmark and the Danish Topic Centre on Waste to conduct a review of 55 life-cycle analyses, all of which were selected because of their rigorous methodology. The researchers then looked at more than 200 scenarios, comparing the impact of recycling with that of burying or burning particular types of waste material. They found that in 83% of all scenarios that included recycling, it was indeed better for the environment.Based on this study, WRAP calculated that Britain's recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain's annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads. Similarly, America's Environmental Protection Agency estimates that recycling reduced the country's carbon emissions by 49m tonnes in 2005.Recycling has many other benefits, too. It conserves natural resources. It also reduces the amount of waste that is buried or burnt, hardly ideal ways to get rid of the stuff. (Landfills take up valuable space and emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas; and although incinerators are not as polluting as they once were, they still produce noxious emissions, so people dislike having them around.) But perhaps the most valuable benefit of recycling is the saving in energy and the reduction in greenhouse gases and pollution that result when scrap materials are substituted for virgin feedstock. If you can use recycled materials, you don't have to mine ores, cut trees and drill for oil as much,says Jeffrey Morris of Sound Resource Management, a consulting firm based in Olympia, Washington.Extracting metals from ore, in particular, is extremely energy-intensive. Recycling aluminium, for example, can reduce energy consumption by as much as 95%. Savings for other materials are lower but still substantial: about 70% for plastics, 60% for steel, 40% for paper and 30% for glass. Recycling also reduces emissions of pollutants that can cause smog, acid rain and the contamination of waterways.</span></span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What year was black history month officially recognized.
madreJ [45]

Answer:

1976

Explanation:

“Fifty years after the first celebrations, President Gerald R. Ford officially recognized Black History Month during the country's 1976 bicentennial.”

6 0
2 years ago
Government, businesses, and people have different ideas on conservation. Think about the views of each of these groups. Write a
lisov135 [29]

Explanation:

<em>Since topic has not been given I am giving generalized opinion where you can add specific pointers.</em>

Respected editor,

Sub: Highlight the important factors of the stake holders

I know we all will be aware of various opinions that is prevailing among Government, business and people. Instead of satisfying one side, I have analyzed and recommending the best aspects.

Based on the opinions, I have chosen based on the below pointers:

  • Will promote Nation building
  • Advantages of implementing
  • Challenges while implementing
  • Possibility study
  • Risk in implementation

So based on the above, I am recommending the following:

.....

I hope you will accept my ideas and do the needful.

Yours faithfully,

XXXX.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the incorporation of the Bill of Rights?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the manorial and seignorial systems work
    10·1 answer
  • Please I need this answered fast!!!! And it has to be correct!! I will give 20 points
    13·2 answers
  • Which two trade goods were the most important to the african trading empires of ghana, mali, and songhai? check all that apply.
    12·2 answers
  • The seventeenth-century philosopher who believed that the mind is blank at birth and that most knowledge comes through sensory e
    12·1 answer
  • What did the north want during the Kansas Nebraska Act?
    12·1 answer
  • The year abraham lincoln was elected and southern states began leaving the U.S
    15·1 answer
  • What geographical features of China led to the growth of cities
    8·1 answer
  • Spain’s recommended route to north New Spain followed the original route of Andres do Campo, which follows the __________.
    8·1 answer
  • The Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions identifies which of the following causes for the women's rights movement in the 18
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!