Answer:
False
Explanation:
Demand is inelastic
Demand is inelastic if a change in price has little or no effect on quantity demanded. The coefficient of elasticity is less than one because the percentage change in price is greater than the percentage change in quantity demanded
If demand is inelastic and prices fall, the quantity demanded would rise. But the rise in quantity demanded is less than the price reduction. Therefore, total revenue would fall.
I hope my answer helps you
A. Offering a safe product will make more people want to buy that particular product.
Answer: context
Explanation:
The factor that has most likely influenced Downing's perception of Law is context.
Context refers to the situation for the occurence of a event. It's vital to look at the circumstances that were present at the time of the behavior of a person when attempting to understand the person's behavior.
Assuming both of them were part of team meetings where almost all member gave their own suggestions, then Law would not have drawn as much attention from Downing.
Answer: $23,200 as total current asset for the period
Explanation:
Note Receivable has a value $16,000
Interest on Note = 5%
Accrued for 9 months
Yearly Interest accrued = 16,000*5%*12= 9,600
Interest for 9 months = 9600/12*9 = 7,200
Balance sheet Extract
Other Income
Int Accrued on Note Receivable $7,200
Current Asset
Note Receivable $16,000
Int Accrued on Note Receivable $7,200
Total Current Asset $23,200
Answer:
I waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation in this research.
Explanation:
The given definition in the scenario is that ''Exculpatory language is that which <u>waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights</u> or releases <u>or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence</u>.''
Therefore in the consent statement requesting that a subject state ''I <u>waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation</u> in this research, directly defines the content of an exculpatory language.
The statement is waiving the responsibility of researchers for negligence and at the same time waiving the legal rights of the research participants