Answer:
(0 , -1)
Step-by-step explanation:
WR = 4 + 2 = 6
WS = 1/3 x WR = 2 .... the point of 1:2 of WR
S (-2 + 2 , -4) i.e. (0,4)
The same reason: RQ = 1/3 x RY = 1/3 x (5 + 4) = 3
Q (-4 , -4 + 3) i.e. (-4, -1)
QP // RW
p (0 , -1)
Looking at this problem in terms of geometry makes it easier than trying to think of it algebraically.
If you want the largest possible x+y, it's equivalent to finding a rectangle with width x and length y that has the largest perimeter.
If you want the smallest possible x+y, it's equivalent to finding the rectangle with the smallest perimeter.
However, the area x*y must be constant and = 100.
We know that a square has the smallest perimeter to area ratio. This means that the smallest perimeter rectangle with area 100 is a square with side length 10. For this square, x+y = 20.
We also know that the further the rectangle stretches, the larger its perimeter to area ratio becomes. This means that a rectangle with side lengths 100 and 1 with an area of 100 has the largest perimeter. For this rectangle, x+y = 101.
So, the difference between the max and min values of x+y = 101 - 20 = 81.
Answer:
P(A︱B) =0.50
Step-by-step explanation:
That's the answer
Answer:3 to 2
Step-by-step explanation:
50 feet cubed because the problem is essentially 5 times 4 times 2.5
