Answer:
0.666 or 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
you would do 2 / 3 = 0.666
0.666 = 2/3
Answer:
Ok
Step-by-step explanation:
I’ll help u
Answer:
It will depend on how many euros they intend to convert. If they were only converting one euro they would get $1.35 whichever rate they used, but imagine it was a thousand euros - at the correct rate they would get $1352.61, at the proposed rate they would only get $1350.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, by rounding the conversion ratio, the Ruiz family will not be getting the most accurate answer. Using the more accurate conversion ratio will give an answer with more than 2 decimal places so the answer can accurately be rounded after the conversion.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
(x, y) ⇒ (x -5, y +3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Pick a point on the original polygon. The extreme left point (at (1, 0)) will do.
Locate the corresponding image point on ABCDE. (It is point B(-4, 3).) Using coordinates, or counting grid squares, determine what must be added to the original point to get the image point.
Here, that addition is 5 squares left and 3 squares up:
image - original = (-4, 3) -(1, 0) = (-5, 0)
So, the transformation rule adds -5 to each x-coordinate and 3 to each y-coordinate:
(x, y) ⇒ (x -5, y +3)
Assuming the n data values are independent draws from a Poisson distributed population with parameter λ , the MLE of λ from the sample is the sample mean, i.e.
Numerous proves are available online.
