Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
This might not be right, but most likely D.
As we've seen in blind people, blindness is adapted to and other skills are highly developed to accommodate. B would be awkward, but not deadly. C would be fine mostly, since we are still able to see. However, D, with no range of motion, we would find it very difficult to defend ourselves and care for ourselves. Again, I might not be right, but that's my opinion.
Answer:
ΔNAS≅ΔSEN by SSA axiom of congruency.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider ΔNAS and ΔSEN,
NS=SN(Common ie . Both are the same side)
SA=NE( Given in the question that SA≅ NE)
∠SNA=∠NSE( Due to corresponding angle property where SE ║ NA)
Therefore, ΔNAS ≅ΔSEN by SSA axiom of congruency.
∴ NA≅SA by congruent parts of congruent Δ. Hence, proved.
You have Lagrangian
with partial derivatives (set equal to 0)
Solving the first four equations for
, respectively, we can substitute these solutions in terms of
into the fifth equation to find
, which in turn will lead to
. Denoting by
, we have
and substituting into the fifth equation yields
From either choice of
we arrive at
, i.e. exactly two critical points at
, for which we get a maximum value of 14 and minimum value of -14, respectively.
Answer:
15.5 15.25 15.75
Step-by-step explanation: