Brutus, No. 1. The Anti-Federalist Robert Yates of New York wrote this essay under the penname “Brutus” in 1787. Like other opponents of the proposed U.S. constitution, “Brutus” accepted the conventional wisdom that republics had to be small and homogeneous—not large and diverse—in order to be successful. The essay argued against a strong central government based on the belief that it would not be able to meet the needs of all US citizens.
Explanation: to comply with what helpyou68 said maybe it's because the essay entailed the constitution in direct change I am guessing he wanted his point to be executed in America falling under executive and by attacking the constitution which deals with the law and those concerning passing and making laws which would fall under legislature and lastly for judicial it has to deal with change in the system possibly addressing legal means. I truly hope this answers your question given the fact my response is based off of HelpYou68's response.
