Answer: I think it means dry place.
Explanation:
The Sirens of Baghdad is the story of one young man’s descent into hell—his journey from innocence to despair, from a peaceful life in a sleepy village to a rage for vengeance in the most violent city in the world. The narrator of the novel is a college student whose studies have been interrupted by the American invasion of Iraq. He has had to return to his desert village, where boredom, scorching heat, and the occasional boiling over of tempers when the war is being discussed are the most serious problems he must face. The war is a distant phenomenon, something they hear about but doesn’t really touch them. That all changes when Sulayman, the local blacksmith’s sweet-natured, mentally challenged son, accidentally severs two fingers and must be taken to the hospital. When their car is stopped at a checkpoint, Sulayman panics, tries to run away, and is riddled with bullets. “Every bullet that struck the fugitive,” the narrator says, “pierced me through and through” [p 57]. But this is only the first of the humiliations and tragedies he must witness. When soldiers come to search the village for suspected insurgents, the narrator watches as his aged father is pulled naked from his bed and thrown to the floor. The disgrace of this moment engender in him a need to wash away in blood the humiliation his father has suffered. This is the turning point that sends him down a path to terrorism and destruction.
Answer:
The sinister business practices of Standard Oil.
Explanation:
She was an American writer and investigative journalist in the late 19th and early 20th century. She is well known for her 1904 book "The History of the Standard Oil Company". In the book, she investigates the company owned by Rockefeller and was an example for many other journalists to write about the attempts to gain monopolies in various industries.
Her work contributed to the dissolution of the Standard Oil monopoly in 1911 after the Supreme Court of the United States found the company guilty of having violated the Sherman antitrust act.
I hope this answer helps you.
I don’t have an answer but I see that the other guy who answered answered on 2 of my questions. He said the Same thing on both of mine which happens to be the same as yours.
Answer:
explained
Explanation:
I think the abolition approach was the best because of the moral position of its argument against slavery. It was mostly peaceful, showing that blacks are not animals, and should not be treated like property, or inferior at all. Abolitionists exposed the immorality of slavery and how blacks are just as human and deserve the same rights and respect as whites do. Colonization was a horrible idea, and it dehumanized blacks. And slave rebellions were powerful way to show resistance and strength, but weren't as effective and didn't seem to work for many slaves died. Abolitionists saw peaceful resistance and powerful words more effective, and they were very influential in the actual abolition of slavery in the U.S. It helped using religious arguments against slavery, calling it a sin; I think this helped whites in America to understand and realize the reality of the slavery and how immoral it was.
