Which image would provide a good counterexample to the statement below?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
0 and -3
Step-by-step explanation:
Natural numbers are all whole numbers from 1 to infinity. i.e
1, 2, 3, 4 . . .
These numbers do not include 0.
Integers are all whole numbers (positive and negative) including 0. i.e
. . ., -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, . . .
These numbers are all natural numbers including their negative counterparts (i.e negatives of the natural numbers) and also 0.
<em>So from the options in the question:</em>
1 is a natural number as well as an integer
-5.41 is not a natural number neither is it an integer.
3 root 12 (written as ) is neither a natural nor an integer number.
0 is an integer but not a natural number
-3 is an integer but not a natural number
-9/7 is neither a natural nor an integer number.
23 is a natural number as well as an integer
Therefore, 0 and -3 are integers but not natural numbers
Answer:
The correct answer is option D:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
log(y)= 3.994
Solution:
A logarithm base b of a positive number x satisfies the following definition:
For
Also if no base b is indicated, the base of the logarithm is assumed to be 10 .
Thus, in log(y)= 3.994 base b is not indicated. so its base is assumed to be 10
now
Then