Just as important as one's empathy is one's ability to remain objective. Your clients need you to keep a level head in order to help them deal with their difficult situations. ... It's a thin line to walk between empathetic and objective, but this is where social workers thrive.
Answer:
Ang mga sagot ay nakasulat sa ibaba
(Les réponses sont écrites ci-dessous)
Explanation:
piyudalismo: ang nangingibabaw na sistemang panlipunan sa medyebal na Europa, kung saan ang mga maharlika ay nagtataglay ng mga lupain mula sa Korona bilang kapalit ng serbisyo militar, at ang mga vassal ay nangungupahan naman ng mga maharlika, habang ang mga magsasaka (mga villein o serf) ay obligadong manirahan sa lupain ng kanilang panginoon at bigyan siya ng paggalang, paggawa, at isang bahagi ng ani, na notionally kapalit ng proteksyon ng militar.
Manoryalismo: isang prinsipyo ng pag-oorganisa ng mga ekonomiya sa kanayunan na kung saan ay nagbigay ng kapangyarihang ligal at pang-ekonomiya sa isang panginoon ng manor
*paumanhin para sa anumang mga pagkakamali, dahil hindi ako marunong magsalita
Keep your current environment well-ventilated.
Make sure to wear a mask if needed.
Open windows and/or doors.
Answer:
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 19, 2000, ruled (6–3) that a Texas school board policy that allowed “student-led, student-initiated prayer” before varsity high-school football games was a violation of the First Amendment’s establishment clause, which generally prohibits the government from establishing, advancing, or giving favour to any religion.
the issue that eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court concerned a policy that called for students to vote on whether prayers would be delivered prior to football games and to select a student who would deliver them. After the students approved the inclusion of prayers at the game, a federal district court ruled that only nonsectarian and nonproselytizing prayers could be delivered. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, ruled that any football prayer was unconstitutional, as a violation of the establishment clause.
The school board contended that control of the pregame message was left to students who also chose the speaker and the content of the message by a majority vote. Thus, according to the board, the prayer qualified as “private speech” and was protected by the First Amendment’s free speech and free exercise clauses. However, the court ruled that The court was of the opinion that the policy would only lead to student messages that were, rather than private speech, actually religious speech directly sponsored and endorsed by a governmental agency.