Answer: Look at the explanation.
Explanation: An environmental consequence could be our land. The more land we use for agriculture results in loss of biodiversity. Slash-and-burn kills many trees and plant life. These trees are home to many small animals and now they are homeless and will die unless they adapt and find a new land. A social consequence could be food deserts. Food deserts are caused by and increase poverty and starvation. Nonexistent stores in rural areas do not help the population. People starve and barely have another way of getting healthy food. They rely on fast food chains which do not help with health.
I'd say everything can be used but only what is needed for particular patient.
Answer:
1) Populations are majorly increasing in areas where shifting cultivation is practiced, causing there to be less area available for use of shifting cultivation.
2) Around the world, overall, there is much less unoccupied land that is able to be used for shifting cultivation.
This is AP Human Geography, right?
Answer:
Connection
Explanation:
Even if I know a answer to a question and I say it they don't hear me
When Von Thunen created his model, he had to assume that all transportation was by ox-cart, farmers were practicing commercial agriculture in a way to maximize profit, all soil was of equal quality, and that all land was flat with no other features.
