1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marat540 [252]
2 years ago
6

Walter is a chemistry teacher who earns $50,000 per year, while Jesse is unemployed. Both Walter and Jesse want to go back to sc

hool to earn a business degree to help them operate their new business. The tuition each one would have to pay is the same, and they have agreed each to pay half of the tuition regardless of which one attends. Assume they cannot attend part-time. Do they indeed face the same cost of enrolling in this program. Why or why not?
Business
1 answer:
katrin2010 [14]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,

Explanation:

The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.

Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.

You might be interested in
The worst loss that could ever happen to a firm is referred to as the
Fantom [35]
The term you are looking for is <span>maximum possible loss.</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Cray Research sold a super computer to the Max Planck Institute in Germany on credit and invoiced €10 million payable insix mont
Reil [10]

Answer:

a) The expected loss from the forward hedging = $432,900

b) No I wouldn’t recommend hedging the euro receivable based on the fact that the future spot rate is better off than the forward exchange rate.  

c) No I wouldn’t because in any case whether you hedge or not there will be no difference.

Explanation:

Solution.

Forward Exchange Rate = $1.10/€, therefore the equivalent of €10 million receivable from Germany in 6-month time = €10 million / Forward exchange rate ($1.10) = $9,090,909

However, the 6 months spot rate is $1.05/€, therefore if we simply wait till 6 months we will receive €10 million / Forward spot rate ($1.05) = $9,523,809.

a) The expected loss from the forward hedging = $9,523,809 - $9,523,809 = $432,900

b) No I wouldn’t recommend hedging the euro receivable based on the fact that the future spot rate is better off than the forward exchange rate.  

c) No I wouldn’t because in any case whether you hedge or not there will be no difference. You’ll just end up paying hedging fees which will impact on profits adversely.  

However it is always advisable to hedge foreign exchange risks because predictions could differ from reality and adverse movements in exchange rates could carry significant financial consequences which may not be comparable to the hedging costs.

7 0
3 years ago
In order for the economy to be strong, businesses must _____.
Arte-miy333 [17]

<u>Answer:</u>  A) Produce goods and pay labour.

<em>In order for the economy to be strong, businesses must produce goods and pay workers</em>

<u>Explanation:</u>

<em>Organizations charge more for their merchandise to pay higher wages, and the higher wages</em> likewise increment the cost of products in the more extensive market.  

The <em>rate increment of the wages and costs and their general impact available are key variables driving expansion in the economy.</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Big Dom’s Pawn Shop charges an interest rate of 27.4 percent per month on loans to its customers. Like all lenders, Big Dom must
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

Annual percentage rate: 328.8%

effective rate: 1728%

Explanation:

APR: Annual Percentage Rate

as the month is monthly we must multiply by 12 to convert into annual

27.4 x 12 = 328.8%

<u>The effective rate will have into consideration the compounding effect:</u>

(1+r_m)^{12}  = 1 + r_e

(1+0.274)^{12}  -1 = r_e

re = 1728%

3 0
2 years ago
Requirement For each of the​ following, indicate whether the amount is​ taxable:
kodGreya [7K]

Answer and Explanation:

All these situations are taxable under lottery tax in the U.S.A, under Federal tax rule, there is 25% amount of winning money you have to pay under lottery tax rule.

If the acceptance of the prize is not based on significant potential benefits and the payment is charged by the education department to a tax-exempt agency approved by Linda, option "C" might be withheld from income.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sandhill Inc. has the following information related to an item in its ending inventory. Packit (Product # 874) has a cost of $76
    5·1 answer
  • A portion of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act makes it illegal to fire or otherwise discriminate against a corporate officer for trying to
    5·1 answer
  • Isabella was hit by a car while she was walking on the road and sustained minor injuries. She filed a case against the car drive
    15·1 answer
  • Rousey, Inc., had a cash flow to creditors of $16,965 and a cash flow to stockholders of $7,559 over the past year. The company
    6·1 answer
  • Fitness is the measure of ____________ and ability to produce more ________
    5·1 answer
  • Adecco Systems has a website service that allows the company to interact with its suppliers and share all types of data related
    13·1 answer
  • Type of power based on manager's ability to influence employees with something of value to them.​
    11·1 answer
  • Accounting
    10·1 answer
  • the arrangements between buyer and seller as to when payments for merchandise are to be made are called
    13·1 answer
  • Kelly is 28 years old and lives in California. This year 2019 tax year, Kelly bought a new auto for $20,000 plus 1,650 in state
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!