Answer:
b. 23.8%
Explanation:
For computing the percentage difference, we have to compute the Pre-tax income of both corporations and the partnership
For corporations:
Pre-tax income = (1 - corporate tax rate) × (1 - personal tax rate)
= (1 - 0.34) × (1 - 0.30)
= 0.66 × 0.70
= 0.462 or 46.2%
For partnership:
Pre-tax income = (1 - personal tax rate)
= (1 - 0.30)
= 0.70 or 70%
So, the difference would be
= 70% - 46.2%
= 23.8%
The statement is false. It would be an advantage to both the client and the organization. This would mean if the client needs a markdown from the provider they would need to pay the receipt inside 10 days to get the rebate, and this would then enable the organization to get their cash speedier.
The option that falls outside of the classification of business expenditures that fall into the category of variable costs is option C. costs of research and development. Read below about costs of research and development.
<h3>What is a costs of research and development?</h3>
These are costs taken to develop new products or processes that may or may not result in commercially viable items. The general rule is that research and development costs are to be expensed immediately when the costs are incurred.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about costs of research and development: brainly.com/question/18685415
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. <u>not valid because performance depends on Parsley's personal skills</u>
Explanation:
A valid contract refers to an agreement entered into by parties which legally binds both parties and is enforceable under the law.
For a contract to be termed as valid, it must be performed by the parties to it.
Performance clause in a valid contract refers to doing or acting in a way as is required by the terms of the contract.
In the given case, Parsley signed a contract to provide services i.e provide French cooking lessons to Curry. Later, Parsley wants to transfer his duties to Relish.
The transfer will not be valid since the performance i.e service to be provided by Parsley are of personal nature and the consideration is based upon that. No two individuals can provide exact services.
Answer:
Since Mrs. O'Malley disenrolled form the plan because she was moving away to a location that was not served by the company, Agent Higgins compensation should not be affected.
If Mrs. O'Malley (or any other client) leaves the plan before the 3 month period because she decides to go back to her former provider since she doesn't like this plan (for whatever personal reason), then the company would be able to recoup Agent Higgins's compensation.
