Colonized nations were dominated by European countries because they __________________.

History

2 answers:

aivan3 [116]3 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is A. They probably held desired resources, including land and labor

Explanation:

Countries from Europe invaded and colonized nations from other continents, especially those of America, Asia, and Africa from the 15th century to the 19th century, those countries look for desired resources, including land and labor. For example, Spain used the labor force of African as slaves and indigenous people in America to get resources such as gold and other minerals for economic development, also, the new land represented multiple advantages in terms of resources and trade, not only in the case of Spain but in other European countries. In general terms, European countries colonized other counties as in those countries they could find resources that were not available in their countries or that were valuable such as gold or emeralds; also, they could use the land and labor of native people to improve their economies.

inysia [295]3 years ago

7 0

They held desired resources which included land and labor. Hope this helps.

You might be interested in

What is the chemical name for No2

alexdok [17]

It is nitrogen dioxide.
And the o should be capitalized $NO_2$

7 0

4 years ago

10 POINTS

netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0

3 years ago

The most important border state was ____.

Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

Maryland

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers