1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
3 years ago
5

What did the supreme court rule in case regarding the sedition act?

History
2 answers:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
7 0
It ruled the act constitutional
uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
4 0

In case regarding the sedition act, the Supreme Court ruled the act constitutional.

The Sedition Act of 1918 constituted an Act of the United States Congress that extended the Espionage Act of 1917 to deal with a great variety of offenses, notably speech and the expression of opinion conveyed by the government or the war effort in a negative sense or interfered with the sale of government bonds.

You might be interested in
How did this map change following the treaty of Washington in 1846
irga5000 [103]
The U.S. and Great Britain fought over the border between the U.S. and Canada. In 1818, they had agreed that the Oregon Territory would be settled by both countries. In 1846, though, the Treaty of Washington expanded the U.S. border with Canada at the 49th parallel to the Pacific Ocean.
<span>Oregon Country was divided between Britain and the United States at the 49th Parallel.
</span>

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of monumental architecture?
harina [27]

Answer

The answer is ziggurat.  

A ziggurat is a Mesopotamian temple and were generally very large, showing off genuine Mesopotamian architecture.  

A mud-brick house isn't exactly monumental, a stela is a slab of stone, and a seed plow is a farming tool.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were democrats called who opposed the civil war
Aleks04 [339]

They were called "Copperheads"

Hope this helps!

-Jen

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the government under the Constitution have that ability now?
dimaraw [331]

<u>Answer:</u>

No, the government under the Constitution does not have that ability now.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • The early governments that were not bound by established rules could implement new decisions through their own conscience every other day.
  • Such governments had given themselves the ability to conduct governance the way they thought was right for society.
  • In other words, they had the ability to govern the governed without the consent of governed.
  • This undue ability of the governments got limitations as the Constitution came into being.
3 0
3 years ago
How did brunelleschi solve his problem with the dome of the florence cathedral?
VikaD [51]
Brunelleschi solve his problem with the dome of the Florence Cathedral by employing sets of diagonal ribs based on the pointed arch and he also created many layers of support within the dome. The answer in this question is by employing sets of diagonal ribs based on the pointed arch.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did nearby rivers and deserts affect the development of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt? Plz help thx!
    10·1 answer
  • A person who favored independence from great britain would be described as a
    11·1 answer
  • 4 examples of early imperialism
    7·1 answer
  • Who made the first emoji?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Australia fire begin ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which is NOT a requirement for the House of Representatives?
    12·1 answer
  • State 2 characteristics of capitalist democracy​
    15·1 answer
  • What was the Holocaust and how did it
    6·1 answer
  • Who were the first natives to encounter Eropeans?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following best explains why some sedentary societies described nomadic groups as, “predatory, violent, and without
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!