1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frozen [14]
3 years ago
12

A.J. is a minority who is walking his dog in a city that has an ordinance to make sure people clean up after their dogs. Of cour

se A.J. has never seen this ordinance enforced, so he just continues walking after his dog defecates. He doesn't know that a rookie patrolman has been watching and observed him fail to clean up his dog's waste. A.J. walks around the corner to find a whole wall of freshly painted graffiti and spray paint cans on the ground. He picks one up to put it in the trash just as the patrolman is walking around the corner to give A.J. an ordinance violation ticket.
A.J. is suing the rookie patrolman for defamation of character and racial profiling. He thinks that the patrolman assumed that he was the perpetrator of the graffiti because he is a minority. What can a state court judge do for A.J. in his defamation case?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Tpy6a [65]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Nothing, this is a civil matter                                                          

Explanation:

A. J., a minority is being fined by a patrolman for violating an ordinance in the area. A. J. has a misassumption that the patrol man fine him because the patrol man saw him with the spray paint cans in his hand near the graffiti made on the wall. A.J. believes that because he belongs to minority, the patrol man id doing racial discrimination on him. So A.J. sues the patrolman on defamation case.

The state court judge can do nothing on this matter because A. J. has been fined for not obeying the ordinance of cleaning the dog's wastes and not for the paint cans that he held near the graffiti wall.

You might be interested in
You are attending a conference on eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (emdr) and are listening to claims of how effect
Artyom0805 [142]

Based on the scenario above, this is an example of the six principles of scientific thinking called the occam’s razor. This is known as a problem solving principle in which provides a set of explanation based on the occurring events and that they are likely to be simple ones.

3 0
3 years ago
Structural improvement, integrative agreements, compromise, and domination are associated with which stage of conflict?
dimaraw [331]

The correct answer is E; Termination.

Further Explanation:

In an intimate relationship, there are several stages that the couple may go through. In this stage, it is the ending of the relationship. Since domination is listed this is when one of the people in the relationship holds all of the power and thus ending the relationship since it is not mutually respected anymore.

Couple can enter therapy and the therapist will hold sessions to determine the stage the relationship is in. The termination stage usually happens after several years of a marriage or relationship. In the middle stage, the couples will usually make a negotiation with each other and see if that helps the relationship.

Learn more about relationships at brainly.com/question/11776119

#LearnwithBrainly

6 0
3 years ago
Which document or institution had the most influence on the development of the united states
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer: The document that has the most influence on the development of the United States is Magna Carta

Explanation: Magna Carta exercised a strong influence both on the United States Constitution and on the constitutions of the various states.

8 0
3 years ago
According to South, some of the ethical problems with informants include all of the following except: a. overestimating the vera
storchak [24]

Answer:

d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.

Explanation:

An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.

In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following individuals is making a situational attribution?
aleksley [76]

Answer: Option A

Explanation: Attributions are inferences people make from events or behaviours ,it might be from someone attitude or an event. We have external and internal type of attribution.

From the above options, there are all attributions but situational attributions are attributions people make from situational events that may one way or the other affect them.

The best option from the options above is option A, Randy doesn't like dirty dishes and what he met in the kitchen was something he doesn't like and the cause of this event is the laziness of his daughter which he blames.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Roberto, a toddler, is left with a stranger in a room when his mother leaves for a few minutes. He is very upset and difficult t
    12·1 answer
  • A common marketing strategy used by retailers to induce customers to buy multiple copies of a product is to list a $3.00 item fo
    5·2 answers
  • Imagine you are approached by a large dog. You assume the dog is unfriendly and start screaming to chase it away. The dog assume
    8·1 answer
  • Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy is extremely strict about what we ought and ought not do. So strict that he argued that it is a
    6·1 answer
  • Danny, who has a damaged amygdala, accidentally spilled kerosene on a campfire and got badly burned. later, dannys reaction to f
    9·1 answer
  • As a result of his protest against Church corruption, Martin Luther was A. promoted to a new position in the Church B. invited t
    12·2 answers
  • Question 9 of 10
    9·1 answer
  • There<br>is cultural<br>the statement<br>diversity in<br>country<br>ustify​
    13·1 answer
  • Virtue ethics undermines attempts to hold people responsible for their bad actions. Group of answer choices True False
    6·1 answer
  • If a Scholar comes to their shift with every component of their uniform except their uniform polo shirt, what should they do acc
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!