The economies of Chile and Venezuela differ based on the fact that they have different trades. For Chile it is considered to be the leader in the export destination and has defeated Venezuela. There are major products that serve as exports and they include petrol, coal and chemical products. The similarity between the two countries is in the fact that they are main exports of Colombia
The correct answer is option A. "determined which jobs workers would hold and where workers would live". When the Bolsheviks took control of the Soviet economy during the Civil War, they adopted War communism. According to historians, Bolsheviks wanted to keep towns (the proletarian power-base) and the Red Army stocked with food and weapons. As a result, Bolsheviks had absolute power of who would acquire a job and where people would live.
Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
For when they took over land? well you have to know that Mexico did not want to give land to America. Eventually though, due to Mexico not having alot of people to live on said land they told Americans that they could settle there .. ONLY if they became Mexicans and they converted to Catholicism. Americans of coarse agreed...BUT......many didn't fuffil that promise . It could be said and arued that the domanent strategy for America was to settle on the land and take it over from the inside.
