Answer:
Africa was damaged economically, politically, and culturally.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
comply with rules, standards, or laws. (of a person) behave according to socially acceptable conventions or standards.
It's like doing something because you friend likes it even though you hate it like if you hate strawberries but you eat them anyway because everyone else likes them
I don't know how this is a question, but it is correct.
People who were scared a strong central government and total control (like the experience with Britain), wanted to give states power to counteract the effect. It made people like Thomas Jefferson feel assured that the U.S. would stay a democracy.