Answer:
Researcher must be honest with subjects to the greatest extent possible.
Explanation:
According to the National Institute of Justice in United States recommended theses rights for human subjects researches.
- Voluntary.
- Respect for persons.
- The right to end the participation whenever they want.
- Right to safeguard integrity.
- Protection from physical or psychological harm.
- Acces to information.
- Protection of the privacy.
Since that it's not mentioned honesty terms, that has to be the answer. Other options are like core values to human researches.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Based on the Judicial Branch the court case that stands out to me the most is Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
For me, this is one of the most important cases in the history of the United States.
The case was decided on May 17, 1954. The Supreme Court decided that state laws in the US public school system that kept racial segregation were unconstitutional.
This was a major advancement in the country regarding the shameful subject of racism. After the US Supreme Court decision, racial segregation in public schools of America ended, at least in theory and by judicial mandate.
"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
Answer: Negative punishment
Explanation:
Negative punishment could be defined as reducing the rate of a specific behavior from an individual by them carrying out tasks that will lead to such. Most of this negative punishment plan is to curtail excesses that have become a challenge to the individual involved. Lori wants to work on her soda intake, so she sets unfavourable conditions to work it out, this is Negative punishment.
The major factors that are contributing to changes in the distribution of power between the national government and the states are:
- The distribution of grants,
- Incentives
- Aid
<h3>The relationship between the states and the federal government?</h3>
The sharing or the distribution of power between the states and the national governments is known to be called Federalism.
Note that a way that the federal government can have some measures of influence over the states is by the sharing of grants, incentives, as well as aid.
Therefore, The major factors that are contributing to changes in the distribution of power between the national government and the states are:
- The distribution of grants,
- Incentives
- Aid
Learn more about Federalism from
brainly.com/question/1899994
#SPJ1
