1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galben [10]
3 years ago
9

Fighting that involves opposing groups of citizens from the same country is called a ______?

History
1 answer:
Olegator [25]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Fighting that involves opposing groups of citizens from the same country is called a Civil War</span>
You might be interested in
How does refraction cause wave crests to move when the waves approach the shore?
Luba_88 [7]
The answer to the question would be nearly parallel to the shoreline.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 3 examples of how Greek and Roman elements were used to affirm America's Democratic Nationalism.
cluponka [151]
Here are three examples of how Greek and Roman elements were used to affirm America's Democratic Nationalism. They helped us form religions such as the religion Judeo-Christian. They also helped in terms of economics through buying and trading things across places. And lastly, they influenced the use of politics <span>like a congress and senate to democracies. Hope this answer helps.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What was the official religion in Rome for the Byzantium people?​
GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

Christianity

Explanation:

The official religion in Rome for the Byzantium people is Christianity.

I hope it helps you

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Soviet Union win the space race?
ivanzaharov [21]

Why the US won the space race?

Conclusion of the Space Race. By landing on the moon, the United States effectively “won” the space race that had begun with Sputnik's launch in 1957. For their part, the Soviets made four failed attempts to launch a lunar landing craft between 1969 and 1972, including a spectacular launch-pad explosion in July 1969.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • in the 1920's the sacco and vanzetti case,the red scare, and the activities of the Ku Klux Klan all represent what?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the United States support allies after Roosevelt's reelection
    8·1 answer
  • What was life like in England in the 1600 S
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following characterize Sufi rituals and practices? Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these statements regarding Great Plains farming in the late nineteenth century is MOST accurate?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the result of the Japanese seizure of Corregidor?
    14·2 answers
  • What impact did the black codes have on equality
    12·1 answer
  • Weird question do you have a fake phone number I could use? Cause like I need to download viber to talk to my friend that lives
    11·2 answers
  • What was one effect of the State Colonization Law of 1825?
    15·2 answers
  • What was one motivation for federal lawmakers to pass the Dawes Act of 1887?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!