1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
12

What actions can the government take if it has a contractionary fiscal policy? How do these actions help to reduce inflation?

History
2 answers:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

If the government has a contractionary fiscal policy it can decrease its own spending, raise taxes, or both. These actions reduce the amount of money in the economy. As there is less and less money available to spend, price increases slow down, thus reducing inflation.

Explanation:

that was the sample response, i got a 100%  good luck!!!

umka21 [38]3 years ago
6 0
1. Contractionary fiscal policy is put in place when a government REDUCES ITS SPENDING OR RAISES TAXES OR DO BOTH. This type of policy reduces the amount of money that is flowing in an economy. The principal goal of a contractionary fiscal policy is to reduce growth to an economic level that is considered healthy by removing money from the economy.
2. When a government put a contrationary fiscal policy in place, this generally reduce the amount of money that is available for the businesses and the consumers in the economy to spend. Contractionary fiscal policy is usually implemented when the demand for goods and services in an economy is very high to the extent of putting increasing pressure on wages and prices thus causing inflation. Reducing the money supply to the economy through fiscal policy will reduce demand and this will bring down the prices of goods and services, thus reducing inflation. <span />
You might be interested in
Who founded Google in 1998
77julia77 [94]
Larry Page and Sergey Brin
7 0
3 years ago
Sometimes people can share a historical story in writing, the news or in a way that can be dishonest or ignore some details. Why
Inga [223]

Answer:

Explanation:

Why the News Is Not the Truth

by Peter Vanderwicken

From the Magazine (May–June 1995)

Tweet

Post

Share

Save

Buy Copies

Print

News and the Culture of Lying: How Journalism Really Works, Paul H. Weaver (The Free Press, 1994).

Who Stole the News?: Why We Can’t Keep Up with What Happens in the World, Mort Rosenblum (John Wiley & Sons, 1993).

Tainted Truth: The Manipulation of Fact in America, Cynthia Crossen (Simon & Schuster, 1994).

The U.S. press, like the U.S. government, is a corrupt and troubled institution. Corrupt not so much in the sense that it accepts bribes but in a systemic sense. It fails to do what it claims to do, what it should do, and what society expects it to do.

The news media and the government are entwined in a vicious circle of mutual manipulation, mythmaking, and self-interest. Journalists need crises to dramatize news, and government officials need to appear to be responding to crises. Too often, the crises are not really crises but joint fabrications. The two institutions have become so ensnared in a symbiotic web of lies that the news media are unable to tell the public what is true and the government is unable to govern effectively. That is the thesis advanced by Paul H. Weaver, a former political scientist (at Harvard University), journalist (at Fortune magazine), and corporate communications executive (at Ford Motor Company), in his provocative analysis entitled News and the Culture of Lying: How Journalism Really Works.

8 0
1 year ago
What are the policies to reverse unemployment
Vaselesa [24]

.          .          .          .         .          .           .

.          .          .          .         .          .           .

.          .          .          .         .          .           .

5 0
3 years ago
How can the President introduce military troops as a police action?
vlada-n [284]

Answer: through executive order

Explanation:

The inferred powers of the president

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the Battle of Midway a turning point in World war 2?
seraphim [82]
The primary way in which the Battle of Midway was a major turning point in the war was that the defeated Japanese found it almost impossible to replace their losses, which made the US the dominant naval force in the Pacific.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Between 1607 and 1754, did the colonies become more or less like England?
    12·1 answer
  • The eighty-five essays written in support of ratification of the constitution are called
    10·1 answer
  • which statement describes an unwritten requirement for becoming president rather than a requirement laid out in the u.s. constit
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes an immediate reaction to Martin Luther King Jr.’s 1968 assassination? There was a nationwide sear
    13·2 answers
  • 2. Which of the following would be considered a positive of big business?
    5·1 answer
  • As total war continued, governments
    12·1 answer
  • These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States . . . they are Absolved from all Allegiance to t
    12·1 answer
  • Did industrialization in Russia undermined the power of czar Nicholas II? Explain.
    7·1 answer
  • Who is the past primester of india​
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a true statement
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!