Answer:
I believe the answer is C
Explanation:
The reason for this answer is because the passage/article explains how the Smokey Bear campaign had helped prevent fires that are caused by human carelessness.
Answer:
The author’s main purpose in this excerpt is to describe a form of code writing using an example.
In the text in question, the author describes how General Clinton inserted a secret message in a text apparently unrelated to the information that he wanted to convey. That is, through a real situation, he exemplifies how a secret message could be introduced that changed the course of history.
Answer:
B. That the South is behind the times and unrefined.
Explanation:
His description of the setting and the physical appearance of the chief editor supports this
Answer:
Agree.
Explanation:
I agree with the quote because it shows how no matter your circumstances, anyone can help improve the world. For example, teen activists, though young, have been making an impact on global issues. This quote might impact my life and the lives of people around me by demonstrating that anybody can make a change in the world and inspire people to start speaking up on issues they're passionate about.
The following sentence uses a straw man argument: "Those who are critical of self-driving cars need to learn to accept technological advances and stop resisting the future."
A straw man argument is when you give the impression that you are countering an opponent's point, when in reality you are "making up" a point that your opponent has not presented. It is like beating down a straw man or a dummy instead of a real adversary.
Here, people who are suspicious about self-driving cars are immediately described by the author as opposed to "technological advances" and "resisting the future." However, few people who have expressed doubts about self-driving cars would say that they are against scientific progress in general. Rather, they are concerned about the safety and the accuracy of the artifical intelligence, for example, but that does not mean that they are opposed to the idea. The author uses this rhetorical device to make his/her opponents lose credibility.
