The author develops the connection between language and cultural preservation in the text; by highlighting that many dialects can exist within the same Language.
<h3>Language, Dialect and Cultural preservation as in the Passage</h3>
The author's intention as observed in the passage is to indicate to the reader that, many dialects can exist within the same language.
On this note, it follows that Quechua words exist in the text for this reason.
Read more on languages and dialect;
brainly.com/question/20032366
I believe the best choice is A) He told his friends he was the best. This is if they're asking if it went well mentally. If they're asking if it went well physically, then the answer is B. Hope this helps ;)
The point of view goes from a third person and is limited to the third person omniscient.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the chapter, Franz Kafka The meta morphis, towards the end, there is a shift that takes place. The shift is that the view of point goes from a third person limited to the third person omniscient.
Omniscient is the person who knows every thing. So the point of view remains limited to that person only because he knows every thing already.
<span>As you may
know, situational irony is where the exact opposite of a hoped-for result is
the outcome. We can see this in the words that appear on
the pedestal: “Look on my works, ye
Mighty, and despair!” This is
situational irony because the works being spoken of are in shambles and would
be nothing of which to be proud or even despair at as they once probably
were/once intended to be. </span>
