Answer:
LOL there is no justifying this but ill try.
Explanation:
The available options are:
A. Repeating the false suggestion several times
B. Electrical shock
C. using a plausible false event
D. Asking the individual to imagine the event.
Answer:
Electric Shock
Explanation:
Option A not correct, because it is LIKELY to be effective in planting the false memories, because repeating the false memory over time, will make it easier for the person involved to retain the false memory.
Option C is not correct, because, using plausible false event for the person involved will make it easier to retain the false memory.
Option D is not correct, because letting the person involved to imagine the false event will make him or her to retain the false memories.
Option B is correct, because, using Electrical Shock, will only make the person involved to retain the memory of electrical shock but not the false memories that need to be planted.
Hence, the right answer is ELECTRIC SHOCK
Answer:
A - Semele; an eagle is the option your looking for.
<span>Cal is not liable to Duff on a negligence theory because "Duff </span><span>was not injured".
</span>
Negligence is an inability to practice suitable or potentially moral ruled care anticipated that would be practiced among determined conditions. The region of tort law known as carelessness includes hurt caused by neglecting to go about as a type of imprudence conceivably with special conditions.
