Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer: Friedrich Hayek’s work The Road to Serfdom argued that centralized Economic Planning ultimately threatened liberty. Conservatives used this book to justify a reduced role for the state in the economy, by equating fascism and socialism with the New Deal.
Explanation: Frederick Hayek in his book <em>The Road to Serfdom</em>, published in 1944, criticized government involvement in the market seeing it as a system that leads to loss of individual freedom.
Centralized Economic planning is key to socialism as a method to ensure equality, but Hayek argued that central planning forces the will of a few people on the public. This is not socialism but dictatorship.
Conservatives, who favored a reduced government role in economic planning quoted this book and equated the New deal with fascism. The New Deal was a program designed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to revive the economy after the Great Depression.
Answer:
?
------------------------------------------
Answer:
Local Unions, National Unions, and Federations
Explanation:
It is easiest to differentiate among three distinct levels within the labor movement: local unions, national unions, and federations.
Explanation:
Samuel Abu Jinapor is the minister of natural resources in Ghana
