Explanation:
The Renaissance was a fervent period of European cultural, artistic, political and economic “rebirth” following the Middle Ages.
Taking place from the 14th century to the 17th century.
The Renaissance period cultivated a new change in art, knowledge, and culture. It changed the way the citizens thought, with first the rediscovery of classical philosophy, literature, and art, as well as the new discoveries in travel, invention, and style.
Answer: The notion that expansion through military conquest would solve Japan's economic problems gained currency during the Great Depression of the 1930s. It was argued that the rapid growth of Japan's population—which stood at close to 65 million in 1930—necessitated large food imports.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>B, Preparing for the experiment, several slides were fixed with dye.</em>
Explanation:
<h3>
Modifiers</h3>
Modifiers are simple words or phrases used to add emphasis to another word in a sentence. Adjectives and adverbs are used to provide emphasis to nouns and verbs respectively. Clauses and phrases can also be used as modifiers in a sentence. <em>The </em><em>nice </em><em>Child; </em><em> </em>In the example, the adjective shows us that the Child is nice and it is the modifier.
<h3>Dangling Modifiers</h3>
A modifier is considered dangling when the word that its will modifier is not contained in the sentence. For example, the nice ........; the nice in this example is dangling because it does not have a word to modify.
Preparing for the experiment, several slides were fixed with dye contains a dangling modifier. "Preparing for experiment" is expressing an action, but the person experimenting is not known. Since the person performing the experiment is not known the phrase "<em>preparing for the experiment</em>" is considered a dangling modifier because it is not modifying any word in the sentence.
Answer:
Explanation:
What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise"? How does this compare with President Theodore Roosevelt’s argument? Compare their arguments.Which position comes closest to the experience of the modern presidency? (Please note that this is about the institution of the presidency in modern experience, not about an individual president). Which position do you prefer?
The president can express no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justifiably implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise. Such specific grant must be either in the federal constitution or in an act of congress passed in pursuance thereof