Answer:
I am debating against the motion.
Explanation:
Brain drain refers to the emigration of highly skilled and educated individuals from their countries of origin which are either underdeveloped or developing to developed countries. Developing countries like India which produce millions of graduates in a year and whose per capita income is quite low suffer negatively for this. Brain drain is a problem for developing countries for the following reasons:
1. It results in further weakening of the economy: Skilled workers are trained from the limited resources generated in weak economies. For there to be a balance, they are expected to give back to the economy. When this does not happen there is a further weakening of the economy which, in turn, makes it harder for the economy to progress.
2. Lack of access to qualified personnel who can positively impact the economy: Citizens of a country usually have their interest at heart. But when intelligent citizens who should contribute and provide solutions to the government and the economy leave the country, there are negative short and long term consequences. One short term effect is that access to good personnel (for example, health practitioners) is limited for the teeming population and this could result in deaths while in the long run, the country experiences stunted growth.
The few reasons stated above prove that truly, brain drain is a bane for developing nations.
There are two main ideas for each passage, in the first one it mentions the positive outcomes of having a pet in class; it can help children with health problems and nervousness in students will decrease. In this sentences it supports the idea of a pet in class, saying the positive results of it and how it helps or it will help children.
In the second passage it mentions the negative outcomes of having a pet in class; they will make some health problems worst and the nervousness in students will increase around them. These two ideas are against the possibility of having a pet in class, mentioning how it will affect students instead of helping them.
What makes these two passages different is the opinion towards one main idea: pets in class. One passage supports it and one is against it.
Hello! Gramatically, let's look at each choice-
(a) says: Mrs. Anderson flies to Sweden tomorrow her plane leaves at 2:00 P.M.
This can't be right, because it's a run-on sentence! If someone were to say this outloud, it would sound as if someone wasn't "taking their time"!
(b) says: Mrs. Anderson flies to Sweden tomorrow, her plane leaves at 2:00 P.M.
This one looks correct. It has a comma which adds a pause. It also connects both statements made in the sentence.
(c) says: Mrs. Anderson flies to sweden tomorrow, and her plane leaves at 2:00 P.M.
This one wouldn't be correct because its listing ideas with "and" in between. It's as if the speaker is saying "she does this and this and that and that..."
So your best choice would be B.
Answer:
They figured out from the internet cartouchs were
Claim: Students should be required to take at least one online class.
Reasons:
Online classes provide more flexibility in students’ schedules.
Students learn valuable skills they can apply in online college courses.
Explanation:
The main claim is to require students to enrol in at least one online class. The reasons are sentences that answer the question why should students enrol or what are the benefits of this mandate. The main reasons are: flexibility and learning valuable skills that would prepare them for further courses offered in online courses in college.
