Answer:
The first annual depoisit will be of 3,373.49 dollars
Explanation:
Given the formula for future growing annuity
we need to solve for the yearly payment:
grow rate: 0.04
annual effective rate: 8% compounding semiannually:

r= 0.0816
FV 2,500,000
n 46
<em><u>Formula for future value fo an ordinary annuity:</u></em>


The first annual depoisit will be of 3,373.49 dollars
Neudjsbqjaisinfhsu sorry need points
Answer: b. False
All analysis of variance procedures <em><u>assume</u></em> that the compared populations have equal variances.
In all analysis of variance procedures, tests like F-test, Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Brown-Forsythe test are used to verify or test the assumption if k samples are from populations with equal variances.
When two or more populations have equal variances, we say that homoscedasticity or homogeneity of variances exist.
The F-test and Bartlett’s test yield best results only if the population is normally distributed. However, Levene’s test and Brown-Forsythe are known to yield good results for data that is not normally
distributed.
Real property cannot be was private property by any method. false because Severance is changing an item from real property to non-public belongings with the aid of detaching it from the land.
Real property is a parcel of land and everything is permanently attached to the land. The owner of real belongings has all the rights of ownership, consisting of the right to possess, sell, lease, and enjoy the land.
Examples of real property are buildings, canals, crops, fences, land, landscaping, machinery, minerals, ponds, railroad tracks, and roads. actual assets consist of undeveloped lands, like a wooded area or a subject, and include buildings, which include houses, condominiums, and office homes. real assets also consist of matters related to the land, like subsurface rights. There are two primary categories of property: actual and private.
Learn more about Real property here:
brainly.com/question/17584053
#SPJ4
Answer: The bank does not need to pay because of the fictitious payee rule
Explanation:
The fictitious payee rule states that in a scenario whereby a person or a bank collects a negotiable instrument like a check and then pays the check to the fictitious person, the drawer of the check is responsible and the loss doesn't fall on the third party who accepted the instrument or in this case, the bank that cashed the check.
Therefore, based on the explanation above, the option that is true is that "the bank does not need to pay because of the fictitious payee rule".