1. It’s it worth it?
2. How does this effect my weekly budget
Answer:
According to a physical count, 600 units were on hand at the end of March. The cost of goods sold for March applying the FIFO method is:
$1081600
Explanation:
MARCH 1 800 20
MARCH 8 8600 22
MARCH 8 15400 22
MARCH 8 22400 24
MARCH 8 27400 24
Final Inv. 600
Sell units 74000
FIFO Purch. Unit cost Sell Un. Cost
MARCH 1 800 20 800 16000
MARCH 8 8600 22 8600 189200
MARCH 8 15400 22 15400 338800
MARCH 8 22400 24 22400 537600
MARCH 8 27400 24 26800 643200
74000 1081600
<span>Well, your costs per title have decreased from:
$780/7 = $111.43
to:
$1080/12 = $90
That represents a decrease in costs of almost 20%.
Then. taking the change in titles processed per dollar of cost (the reciprocals of previous calculations), means that total productivity has increased by around 23.8%. Are you calculating labor productivity as including overhead? Because then the answer is 23.8%.</span>
Jason McCurdy's gross pay was $684.21.
Given that the regular hourly rate is $10.75. During a two-week period, he worked 80 hours (40 hours each week) and had deductions of $110 for federal income tax, $53.32 for social security tax, and $12.47 for Medicare tax.
Total working hours = 80 hours
Hourly rate = $10.75
Total payment = $10.75 × 80
= $860
Deductions = Federal Income Tax + Social Security tax + Medicare Tax
= $110 + $53.32 + 12.47
= $175.79
Gross Pay = Total Payment - Deductions
= $860 - $175.79
= $684.21
To know more about the income tax system refer to:
brainly.com/question/13745838
#SPJ4
Answer:
Decrease by $30,000
Explanation:
Cost to buy = 15,000 * $34
Cost to buy = $510,000
Note: Since Ortega is buying 15000 units at $34, the $40,000 avoidable cost on fixed manufacturing overhead is non-applicable.
Cost of making = $150,000 + $240,000 + $90,000
Cost of making = $480,000
So, if Ortega purchases the component from the supplier instead of manufacturing it, the effect on income would be decrease by $30,000 ($510,000-$480,000).
