Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
The answer on Edgenuit is:
A. <span>The Song rulers created the first paper currency in history.
have a good day
</span>
<span>Unlike today, citizens during the gilded age expected the Federal Government to have little to no effect on their daily lives.</span>
When a caregiver responds appropriately to an infant, and the caregiver and the child's emotional states match, it is called interactional synchrony.
Interactional synchrony is synchronised behavior exchanged between a caretaker and an infant. For example, a caregiver may smile in response to an infant's laughter, and vice versa.
The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, exists as a social psychological theory that conditions that individuals exist less likely to offer help to a victim when there exist other people present.
<h3>
What is bystander effect?</h3>
The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, exists as a social psychological theory that conditions that individuals exist less likely to offer help to a victim when there exist other people present. the bystander effect, the inhibiting effect of the presence of others on an individual's willingness to help someone in need. Research has revealed that, even in an emergency, a bystander exists less likely to extend assistance when he or she is in the real or imagined existence of others than when he or she exists alone.
The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, exists a social psychological theory that conditions that an individual's likelihood of helping declines when passive bystanders stand current in an emergency. Bystander apathy exists as a symptom of the bystander effect. The bystander effect happens when bystanders do not interfere when watching someone be crushed or otherwise in need of help. For example, bystanders catching a child being forced into a car by a stranger might not interfere to support or contact the police.
To learn more about bystander effect refer to:
brainly.com/question/12499646
#SPJ4
