Answer:
B. applying most Bill of Rights protections to state governments.
Explanation:
Incorporation, according to United States law is simply the way sections of the Bill of Rights are applied to state level instead of only federal level.
Before the 20th Century, most notably in 1833, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to federal legal and not at state level. Also in 1876, the Supreme Court also ruled that the First and Second Amendment didn't apply to the state level.
However, from the early 1900s, there were decisions taken by the Supreme Court which interpreted that the Fourteenth Amendment was to incorporate many parts of the Bill of Rights and for the first time, it was applicable to state governments.
An example that I would give of a situation in which a real-life problem has to be solved or a decision has to be made using good judgement would be the case of deciding what to study in university:
<em>"When I had to decide what I was going to study, I immediately put journalism out of my mind, as I believed it did not suit my personality. Even though I loved writing, I had always imagined that journalists had to be aggressive, </em><em>overconfident</em><em> and pushy, and that news only happened in other, more interesting places. I could not see how that could fit me. The school counselor I talked to kept telling me that this was not the case, but my </em><em>belief perseverance</em><em> would not let me listen to other information. In the end I decided to go for accounting. I believed that accounting was only about boring numbers, and for the first few months, I was responsible of </em><em>confirmation bias</em><em>, as that was the only thing I noticed about my studies. However, over time, I grew to like the path I had chosen, and I do not regret it."</em>
Answer: mere exposure effect
Explanation: usually when you see a group of men standing around each other, you would want to stay away from them because maybe they might be selling drugs or who knows what and you wouldnt want to walk right through them because they'll probably get mad you.
Answer:
As per Kristy Johnson's letter where she mentioned the clauses of the acceptance of offer, she clearly mentioned that she will consider a response only if it is in written form and is sent through US mail.
Now Judy did as per the clauses and sent her a written acceptance through US mail whereas Michael telephoned her and let her know of her acceptance. If Kristy is adamant on her terms that she clearly mentioned in her letter to both and will stick to her word, then technically, it is Judy's fair right on the Montana interests whereas Michaels telephone call will be discarded as it did not fulfill the terms.
