The council house fight resulted in an increased hostility towards whites by the Comanches.
Explanation:
The Comanches were nomads , while the Texans were settlers.When the Texans moved into the Comanches territory,the Comanches were not very happy with it and started raiding and stealing Texans horses, cattle and children.
But later the Comanches wanted peace , so they called for a negotiation talk with the Texans. The Texans demanded the Comanches bring all the white prisoners in good faith.
However, when the Comanches came on the day of the council house of fight,they came with only one prisoner,This angered the Texans and it lead to a fight between the two leading to a massacre of both the parties.
In the end only on one Comanche chief along with some women and children survived.So this lead to further animosity between the Comanches and the Texans.
Answer:
<h3>Ok! hope i understood correctly </h3>
Explanation:
<h2>1:
</h2><h2>Name three things Hammurabi’s laws tell us about the Babylonian Period.</h2><h2 /><h2>2:What does “specialization” refer to in Mesopotamian society?</h2><h2 /><h2>3: Name three important inventions that originated from Mesopotamia.</h2>
It was Andrew Jackson.
He led a mixed force against the British army at the Battle of New Orleans. Among the defenders were regular troops, frontiers
men, Native Americans, free Black men and even pirates who fought the invaders
that resulted into victory. Jackson
would later be elected president of the United States.
The correct answer is "Should all people late for important meetings ignore crosswalk signals?"
The concept of categorical imperative was developed by the German philosopher <u>Immanuel Kant</u>, as the central concept of his deontology, an aspect of moral philosophy that deals with duties. Kant's goal was to define a way to assess the motivations for human action at all times in life. An imperative would be any proposition that declares a particular action as necessary, based on this notion Kant divides the imperatives into two categories: categorical and hypothetical.
Those maxims that would be acceptable as a universal law, and can be considered adequate motivation for human action, would be categorical imperatives, implying an absolute and unconditional demand. This cannot be disobeyed, no matter the circumstances, being an end in itself, that is, no other purpose can justify disobedience and the categorical imperative needs no other justification. Unlike hypothetical imperatives, which have application when we want to achieve a certain end, for example, if we want to acquire knowledge, it is imperative that we learn. The hypothetical imperative is linked to the end, or the purpose, desired by the one who acts, thus facilitating the decision of what the correct action to take, is hypothetical because, once the agent has no interest in accomplishing that end, or not the necessary action is taken to carry it out, there is no obligation to follow it. In this sense, it is optional and conditioned to our inclinations.
-The firs way is by giving advice to the Congress.
Federal agency consist of several departments that possess various expertise that hold the country together. So listening their advice would give the congress different perspectives on what best for the country.
- Since every complain from the citizens are directed to the federal bureaucracy, they possess the data that represent the interest of the majority citizens.
