Answer:
Right
Explanation:
Right if you expect tax rates to go up or because right now you are starting your career and your tax bracket would be lower now than what it will be later on. When you are older and in retirement, you would want to save your money and not have to worry about any taxes.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) Revenue $540,000
less: Salaries for drivers (390,000)
Fuel expense (54,000)
insurance (74,000)
Division line (44,000)
Net loss (22,000)
If division is eliminated the income would increase by $22,000
So it should be eliminated.
2) Decrease in income = $600,000 - ($540,000+$22,000)
= $38,000
3) What is the minimum amount of revenue required = 600,000 - 38,000 = $562,000
Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.
Answer:
where's the picture I cant find it
The closest to the minimum number of consumers needed to obtain the estimate with the desired precision is (b) 271
Explanation:
When the prior estimate of population proportion is not given , then the formula to find the sample size is given by :-
where E = Margin of error.
z* = Critical z-value.
As per given , we have
E = 5%=0.05
Confidence level = 90%
The critical value of z at 90% is 1.645 (By z-table)
Put all values in the formula , we get
n=0.25(1.645/0.05)²
n=0.25(32.9)²
n=270.6025≈271
Thus, the minimum sample size needed = 271
Hence , the correct answer is 271 .
