<em>Answer:</em>
<em>Correct answer choice is : It prevented states from denying citizens equal protection under the law. </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. The amendment speaks citizenship rights and equal security of the laws and was introduced in reply to concerns compared to former slaves following the American Civil War.</em>
Answer:
C. giving private property to all farmers
Explanation:
The Chinese Communist Party in 1958 introduced a five-year plan of agricultural collectivization and rural industrialization called the Great Leap Forward.
Many changes were made under this plan including labor forced to stable the economic growth, all the properties of people were taken under government, Political stability and a growing labor force led to economic growth, people were forced to do farming otherwise they were punished, and created communes and cooperative farms for rural industrialization.
No private property was given to the farmers rather they were forced to do agriculture and their condition was very bad during the Great Leap Forward.
Hence, the correct answer is "C".
Answer:
Persia's major success as an influential empire were transportation, coordination, and their tolerance policy. One of the main reasons that the Persian Empire was so successful was because of their tolerance of non-Persian citizens living in Persia.
The parts of criminal trials that has not been part of selective incorporation
is the the right to a jury composed from the area where the crime was
committed .
The criminal trials have experienced some amendments over the years such as the right to a speedy and public trial.
The right to a jury composed from the area where the crime was committed
hasn't however been fully incorporated as the main aim of a trial is to secure
an accurate conviction.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25260121
The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
