1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hunter-Best [27]
3 years ago
8

Refer to the optimization analysis used to make a decision about the choice of an apartment. Suppose the government in a certain

country wants to reduce urban sprawl.​ (Urban sprawl refers to the development of residential and commercial areas in the suburbs around the periphery of a city. One of the main problems with urban sprawl is that it leads to increased traffic congestion and air pollution as commuters travel to the city every​ day.)
What measures could it take to ensure that people choose to live closer to the central business​ district?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The topic of urban sprawling, defined as the expansion of urban living from the cities towards the outskirts of them, known as suburbs, is a pretty complex one. In essence, it is a difficult topic because people are finding in the suburbs not only every commodity that they once enjoyed in the city itself, but they are also finding it more peaceful. The increased sense of comfort, and also of tranquility and elevated sense of welfare, despite having to commute to work into the city, has driven more and more people to move towards these outskirt communities. Another point to suburban living is that housing prices seem to be cheaper on the outskirts of a city than within it, and in most places, city living conditions: transport, recreational areas, streets, security, among others, are not good enough to tempt a person living in the outskirts to choose to come back to the city.

Thus, if a government in a certain country wishes to reduce urban sprawling and lure people back into the cities, there are a series of measures that they will need to take to achieve this.

1. Increase property taxes on suburban homes. Ricing the price of houses in the suburbs will make a person think twice before leaving the city. Most people choose the outskirts because they are cheaper.

2. Increase city conditions in general: ensure good transportation systems so people have easy access both to their workplace, school systems and commercial establishments. Ensure there are enough recreational areas, and that security is enhanced, among other such things.

3. Lure back in companies so that they decide to re-settle within the city, thus making workers choose to move back into the city to live close to where they work.

4. Improve the school system inside the city. A lot of people prefer to go to the outskirts because schools have settled there that offer better conditions than those inside the city.

Like these, there are many more ways in which a government can discourage urban sprawling and repopulate cities.

You might be interested in
Why did New Jersey's delegates object to the Virginia Plan?
VladimirAG [237]
They preferred a system in which all states had equal representation.
5 0
3 years ago
Hey could anyone help me out in dis pls
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Geometry

Geoscience

Geothermal

~~~

Zoography

Autography

Typography

3 0
3 years ago
Samantha has lived in the united states all of her life. she has been socialized into the u. s. american culture and internalize
kherson [118]
She been to London and Paris
6 0
4 years ago
Look at these two events. 2002 - Congress passes the McCain-Feingold Act. This law includes limits on the use of "issue ads” by
Alenkinab [10]

Answer: a. The McCain-Feingold Act violates freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Issue ads refer to a scenario where a candidate is named or discussed in relation to an issue without however, supporting or decampaigning an opponent.

This was restricted after the McCain-Feingold act of 2002. The Act restricted the use of Issue Ads within <em>30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general election </em>for a person running for any Federal Office<em> </em>if the broadcast cost more than $10,000.

The Supreme Court ruled in its decision that unless the ad was expressly supporting or decampaigning a candidate, it should be exempted from the Act. The decision of the Court was also noteworthy as the Court declared it was against greater regulation of political speech.

A supporter of this Act would therefore probably seize upon this last part and say that the Act violates freedom of speech.

8 0
4 years ago
The Milgram experiment required the participation of a(n) ________ to play the part of the person being shocked because the expe
disa [49]

Answer:

Confederate

Explanation:

hope this helps you :)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What prevented the Lapita, Polynesians, and others from developing an empire in Oceania and nearby regions of the world?
    8·2 answers
  • Information about the coat of arms of Ecuador
    9·1 answer
  • large social and economic changes followed from the domestication of plants and animals and the gradually increasing efficiency
    5·1 answer
  • What problems did the United States have with Great Britain? <br><br> Answer quick pls!
    11·2 answers
  • Charles was studying symbolic interactionism in his sociology class. Charles was surprised to find that sociologists who take th
    5·1 answer
  • Bruno is asked to estimate which California city occupies a greater area: San Francisco or San Jose. "San Francisco is a big cit
    13·1 answer
  • what does it mean to say that let's make America great again in your prospective if you would have to say it yourself?
    15·2 answers
  • During World War I, Turkish nationalists took control of the Turkish
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!! FREEDOM OF SPEECH ESSAY! 15 POINTS!
    6·1 answer
  • Last three roles each, that people, civil societies and the government play to control corruption.​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!