Answer:
Year Cash Flow (A) Cash Flow (B)
0 -37,500 -37,500
1 17,300 5,700
2 16,200 12,900
3 13,800 16,300
4 7,600 27,500
1) Using an excel spreadsheet and the IRR function:
IRR project A = 20%
IRR project B = 19%
2) Using the IRR decision rule, Bruin should choose project A.
3) In this case, since the length of the projects is only 4 years, then there should be no problem with the IRR decision rule, but for projects with longer time lengths, the discounts rates might vary and the best option is to use the modified internal rate of return (MIRR). But in this case the NPV of project B is higher, then Bruin should probably project B because it has a higher NPV. The NPV is always more important then the IRR.
4) Again using an excel spreadsheet and the NPV function:
NPV project A = $6,331
NPV project B = $8,139
5) first we must subtract cash flows from A by the cash flows from B:
1 $11,600
2 $3,300
3 -$2,500
4 -$19,900
then we calculate the IRR = 16%
Bruin should be indifferent between the two projects at a 16% discount rate. That means that at discount rates above 16%, you should choose project A, but at discount rates below 16%, you should choose project B
A problem in developing effective compensation for teams is that rewarding individuals erodes cohesiveness. Thus the first option is correct.
<h3>What is Cohesiveness?</h3>
Cohesiveness refers to the act or the property of togetherness. in the group , cohesiveness can be seen when the group performs the activity. It is important to have cohesiveness in every group for the accomplishment of the task.
When a individual in a group is provided a compensation it leads to dispute and chaos which erodes the cohesiveness of the group. Thus the first option is correct.
Learn more about Cohesiveness here:
brainly.com/question/13774781
#SPJ1
The answer is D. <span>. most companies recognize the need for organizational leaders to get feedback from their employees
For most companies, the upper management level employee rarely took any form of advice/feedback from lower level employees.
This is really dangerous for the well-being of the company because not only it cause resentment among them, it also make the company miss the chance to detect the fatal flaw that may exist in their operation</span>
Answer: Direct materials quantity variance.
Explanation:
Direct Material quantity variance is the difference between the actual quantity of materials used in production and the standard quantity that was supposed to be used, multiplied by the standard price of the material.
It is a method that checks the company's efficiency is being able to use raw materials to produce goods. If the Actual quantity needed is greater than the Standard quantity, this will be considered an Unfavorable Variance and mean that the company was not efficient in using the materials.
Causes of this can be low quality of materials and inadequate employee training.
