Answer:
The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Report (MA, 2005), broadly defines ecosystem services as ‘the benefits humans obtain from ecosystems.’ However…. Not operational for all research purposes (Boyd and Banzhaf 2007, Wallace 2007 and Fisher and Turner 2008, Maeler et al. 2008), and efforts have been made to more carefully classify and understand ecosystem service to make their analysis more operational Fisher et al 2009). Ecosystem services are the direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human well-being, they support directly or indirectly our survival and quality of life. I. INTRODUCTION TO THE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
3. From an economic standpoint an Ecosystem service is ‘a good or service flowing from an ecosystem that is of value to humans and occurs naturally’. Ej = r (N) Ej = jth ecosystem service N = natural capital (ecosystem structure) r = ecosystem function or process Example: Water quality= r (precipitation, terrain, soils, aquifers, biota) Introduction…
The central government in federalism is the government that would be most powerful because it would combine the powers of the states but still won’t be that much more powerful than the states
<span>The contact hypothesis has been described as one of the best ways to improve relations among groups that are experiencing conflict. Gordon W. Allport (1954) is often credited with the development of the contact hypothesis, also known as Intergroup Contact Theory.
When jenny's parents told her that they were moving to alabama, she was horrified because she secretly thought that southerners were mostly poorly educated and racist. after experiencing the foods, traditions, and people in her new state, she was surprised to realize that southerners weren't all alike, and that many of her new friends were just like her. this is an example of: the contact hypothesis.</span>
The US alone was able to produce much more than both Germany and Japan.
Germany was not able to produce as much, as their equipment was usually more stronger and durable, but it also meant it took longer to produce. They also continue to research options for a 'stronger weapon', and so their funds were little
Japan did not have the resources to produce good technology. Instead, they relied on their human strength and their beliefs.
The US, though their equipment was only average, were much more easier to produce, and combined with large funds, resources, and the populations' willingness to work, made their output larger than almost all the countries combined
hope this helps
Answer:
A
Explanation:
just look into their similarities, including advancement again, in the text.
