How did social structure contribute to discontent in Latin America? The social structure permitted peninsulares to dominate the political and social life, the creoles resented their 2nd-class status, and mestizos and mulattoes were enrages that they were denied the status, wealth, and power that the whites had.
True, Aristotle believed it was the governments responsibility to serve its people.
The correct answer is Jean-Jacques Rousseau
This concept that citizens would willingly give up some of their freedoms in order to be protected by the government is known as the social contract. This idea is still used in countries all across the world, especially in the United States. In the US, we vote for politicians to make laws for us. This allows society to have structure and holds people accountable for wrongdoing.
The push factors were, for the most part, was that people in England were getting persecuted for their beliefs. Some people moved who had a lot of debt, to start a new life. The pull factors, as I know it, were just on where did people land on. And for the future ones, since each part of the colonies did different things, it was what their interests were.
Answer: To the Roman government.
Explanation:
For a simple reason, because it is the government that creates military policy. Without quality and strong political leadership, it is not possible to achieve success on the battlefield. Rome spread primarily through military conquests and quality organization and discipline in the army. But such a structure has just been formed in the political circles of the Roman Republic.