There exists the same question that has the following choices.
<span>a. It is an inherently renewable fuel source.
b. Multiple processing steps can be avoided.
c. They produce chemical energy through photosynthesis.
d. They make a biofuel alternative to gasoline.
</span>
The correct answer is letter <span>b. Multiple processing steps can be avoided.</span>
I believe that all the above are ethical concerns regarding genetic engineering. Ethics is the study of moral or socially acceptable behavior. With the advent of genetic engineering and the ability to modify the genome of various organs, many ethical questions arise concerning the various scenarios and possibilities. There are many ethical concerns regarding genetic engineering in plants, animals, and humans. One of the ethical concerns regarding genetically modified plants used for food is whether the nutritional value will be sacrificed in favor of a higher yield or drought resistantancy.
Answer:
As I think the answer is D.
When looking at phylogenetic trees such as this you should always remember that the species that have a very close common ancestor are closely related and the further away their common ancestor is, the less related they are.
So, as you can see in the picture shown in green, modern camels are very closely related to Eschiatus and distantly related to Stemylus, so the first statement is not true, but the second statement is (shown in red)
As you can see shown in light blue, the modern camel is very closely related to Camelops and the Aepycamelus is a distant relative, so the third statement is true.
Procamelus and Stenomylotus are more likely to share similar features ( statement 5, shown in brown) than Pliauchenia and Oxidatus ( statement 4, shown in purple) because their last common ancestor is closer.