Answer: I’m honestly not surprised because it definitely seems like a very one sided decision. The United States Supreme Court was presented with an opportunity to correct the error of their ruling in Roe. Instead, the Court arrogantly chose to maintain their position in an all too common case of “repeat judicial activism.” In the courtroom, decisions are too often guided – not by legislation – but rather by so-called “case-law,” i.e., past court decisions, or precedent. This adherence to “precedent” is said to provide consistency and uniformity among the numerous courts of the United States. However, blind adherence to bad precedents results in the “consistent and uniform” multiplication of bad results.
Explanation:
Answer:
Correct choice is <u>option D. </u>
Explanation:
A historian's work is similar to that of a police officer's. A historian researches a lot about whatever their topic is. They both go above and beyond to confirm his or his research or findings about a past history event. They both look for firsthand or even secondhand experiences on the subject. They both look for actual witnesses to support their claims on their findings.
Automation is using machines to operate other machines
C is the answer. It was a political crisis between 1832 to 1837. The leaders of South Carolina tested the doctrine of the nullification when it declared a federal tax null and void