1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denis23 [38]
3 years ago
11

How were the state constitutions important to the writing of the U.S. Constitution?

History
1 answer:
BARSIC [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is D.Lessons learned in setting up state governments were helpful in setting up the United States government.

Explanation:

A federal government lead by the congress and an executive president that was selected by the entire population of the country was required to unify the states and to lead the nation to achieve her common goals. While respecting the individual states and their ability to decide for themselves, this central government requirement was sen by the forefathers.

You might be interested in
At the first appellate court hearing of the automotive accident case of Wag v. Dollup, the court of first instance's verdict was
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

take the case to the United States Supreme Court

Explanation:

From the scenario given, it can be inferred that the case has been decided at the court of the first instance, which is the lower court.

Also, the court has been decided at the first appellate court, which is the court of appeals. Then If Wag's lawyer wants to appeal this decision, (, the decision of the court of appeal) he will " take the case to the United States Supreme Court."

This is because it is the Supreme Court that has jurisdiction over the appeal courts.

Note: since it is not specified that the case is exclusive of the state laws, then it is assumed that the automobile accident, in this case, involved federal laws.

Hence, the next step is to "take the case to the United States Supreme Court"

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or False: The Preamble of the Constitution is found in Article VII (7) of
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

False

It is the beginning to the Constitution which states the goals of the government.

Article 7 explains how many state ratifications are needed in order for the proposed Constitution to take place in the United States and how a state could go about ratifying the Constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Using the map's scale, what is the approximate straight-
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

The Answer Is 2000

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Spartan homes look like?
IceJOKER [234]

they looked like greek homes but more uniqe



7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the result of the Roosevelt Corollary?
    12·2 answers
  • A The Nabataean city of Petra a was a center of trade where the Greek language was banned.
    12·1 answer
  • It takes 63 minutes for 4 people to paint 9 walls how many does it take 7 people to paint 4 walls
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the League of Nations significant?
    6·2 answers
  • Which characteristic of water molecules makes
    11·1 answer
  • What kinds of changes and reforms did muckraking journalists contribute towards? Give two examples.
    5·1 answer
  • How are the achievements of Indira Gandhi similar to those of golds Meir?
    9·1 answer
  • A cease-fire
    13·1 answer
  • Help i can't go back to brainly ph <br>(;´༎ຶٹ༎ຶ`)​
    13·2 answers
  • Who was the best US president outline
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!