Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
 
        
             
        
        
        
The correct answer is organize textual information by analyzing similarities and differences.
Explanation: This type of strategy will allow the person to be able to identify certain issues in a simpler way because all the process will be conditioned in the mind. This facilitates the way of learning and absorbing content in general.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Based on Oliver's situation and his parents poor credit score, a recommended federal loan that could be appropriate for him would be the Subsidized Stafford Loan. This loan is based on financial need. The interest is paid for by the government while Oliver would be in school. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>Our families have been with us through our growing
years and they saw every bit of our strengths, weaknesses, capabilities and
tendencies as a person. It is natural that when we solicit for decision on very
important matters such as business, we seek for their opinion as they see the
‘blind spot’ in the situation.</span>
 
        
             
        
        
        
John Hospers argues that most if not all, human behavior is motivated by complex psychological factors that humans can't control. Therefore, humans cannot act differently than they do, they are not responsible for their actions, and they can't be held morally accountable for them.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Mary Daly was a radical feminist. She described herself as lesbian radical feminist. She taught women studies in Boston college and did not allow male students in her class. Androcentrism, women's liberal movement were governed by her.
John Hospers was a philosopher and psychologist who studied human behavior and identified several psychological and emotional factors control human behavior. He told that humans are not responsible and accountable for their behavior because it is fully psychologically driven.