The information from the excerpt that best supports the inference that certain video games resulted from issues related to national security is this:
- "Since the first head-mounted display was built for the Pentagon in 1968, primitive versions of virtual reality have since proliferated to video arcades around the country."
<h3>Which information from the excerpt best supports the inference?</h3>
The information from the excerpt that best supports the inference that certain video games arose from issues related to national security is that which shows that it was after the first head-mounted display was built for the Pentagon that primitive versions of virtual reality began to be built.
So, the second part of the sentence points to the relationship between virtual reality and security.
Learn more about virtual reality here:
brainly.com/question/26705841
#SPJ1
Answer: B.The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
yes because it helped him in the future
Conspiracy theories were always irrational ideas without evidence that’s what a “theory” is so if you have proof you have to have the dates, witnesses, because anyone can fake a video or picture with the help of video editing. Though many people use the term debunk to infer that they have falsified an idea, over the years, it has become less rational an endeavor. Today many debunkers are actually pseudo-skeptics. Instead of considering an idea and trying to falsify it, many debunkers just assume science is on their side and instead try to a priori dismiss the idea, and worse to discredit the person who proposes the idea. That is not rational skepticism or critical thinking. Debunking isn’t always falsification or refutation but as often as not just name-calling and denial.
Answer
Since anything can be called a conspiracy theory, and since debunking can be achieved by put-downs and shaming; any idea you don’t like, you call a conspiracy theory and its proponent a conspiracist, and then contemptuously mock the idea and the person who advocates it. Easy-peezy-debunky-sleazy.
88 views
2
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
